Saturday, October 14, 2017

The Nightmare Before Christmas: Review and Commentary


How do you do,


    There is a reason scripture says "do not plow with an ox and an ass"[1]. The ox has strength while the donkey has speed; the ox will be guided to the right direction while the donkey is stubborn enough to not heed, unless some treat is held ahead; the ox is patient in work while the donkey will make much noise. In other words, they don't agree with each other and work will be unproductive without unity. 
    What does this have to do with the movie? It is to illustrate the point that the film has in the story: unless they are episodes in a characters life, one can't have a story with Hallowe'en and Christmas.

    Hallowe'en and Christmas. In the old days, it was easy to tell which is which because they both have differing histories, yet were only the same in being set up by the Christian Church in the Medieval period in place of old Pagan holidays.
    Christmas was set up as the celebration of the Birth of Christ, though the Holy Bible does not give us the exact date that Jesus was born. From clues, it can be assumed His actual birthday was in the spring, but the scientific research suggests Jesus to have been born in the month of June. We don't even have the year, being either 6 or 4 BC. It was settled to have the celebration happen on December 25 which was mere days after the Winter Solstice and coincided with the Roman festival of Saturnalia. This ancient festival was largely something like Marde Gras is today, with the festivities concluding with gift giving, consisting of presents made of wax. With the advent of Christianity in the Empire, this celebration fell by the wayside and the celebration of the Nativity took shape. Another ancient festival was that of Yuletide, a Northern European sort. This one involved decorating household with ferns and evergreens to keep a bit of spring during the winter while the god Odin would visit with presents. Today, these have passed on as the Christmas tree and visits from Santa Claus. The word Christmas come from the Anglo-Saxon "Christe Mass", meaning "Christ's Mass", and it was originally a season and not just a day. Beginning with the vigil on Christmas Eve, Christmas became a twelve day season that continued with additional feast days and ending with the Epiphany. In the Middle Ages, this season was also when people went into the Festival of Fools (like in The Hunchback of Notre-Dame). In short it was something like Marde Gras. The modern celebration of Christmas is more recent, having its origins in the Puritanical societies of England and America, where carolers would sing carols for a treat and make mischief if not appeased, before the more family friendly picture from the Victorian Era.
     Hallowe'en differs in lacking a Biblical account to origins. Instead, we have the ancient feast of Samhein (pronounced Sa-wain) in the British Isles. The Druids celebrated this feast as a new year with bonfires, guising, and divination, supposedly. After Christianity came, Samhain was also abandoned and the All Saints' Day was set up on the first of November, coinciding with the Pagan feast. Later, it was joined by All Souls' Day where it was to remember the departed who were in Purgatory. To balance this came All Hallows' Eve, which is roughly translated as "All Holy Eve", and the slurring of it lead to the word Hallowe'en. The Christian celebration of All Hallows' Eve included the baking of soul cakes for the All Hallowtide and making of lanterns in turnips to ward off spirits, but the celebration was also suppressed by the Puritans. Gradually, it made its way to America where guising became putting on costumes. Trick o' treating arose from the tradition of begging on this particular day (some of which was connected to Caroling in Christmas) which gave the threat of vandalism if nothing was given or the treats were unsatisfying (Charlie Brown could have put those rocks to use). In America, it use to be common for vandalism to happen on Halloween night until it was decided to appease the children with sweets (from lollipops to candy apples). There was also the fascination with ghosts that arose from the All Saints' and All Souls' days that became ghouls, the more spacious pumpkins replaced turnips as a Jack o' lantern, the bobbing for apples done in parties (coinciding with the apple harvest), and telling of ghost stories. Here too was the more familiar celebration a product of recent times.
    So that is the general history of Hallowe'en and Christmas, two holidays with a mixture of Pagan and Christian elements from the old world, brought to the new, and realized in the 19th Century, and both have become commercialized. You can walk into stores at this time of the year and see their decorations out already and in more times than not you'll see Hallowe'en cards that feature white ghosts, orange pumpkins, green skin witches, and black cats, along with Hallowe'en themed candy. Costume stores also sell costumes that have a devilish side to it, though many targeted for adults are a little more erotic than macabre. The same with Christmas. If you took ten types of decorations, only one of them would feature Jesus, the Nativity setting, or anything Biblical basis while the rest are white snowmen (like Frosty), Santa Claus, Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, a giant present, and so on. If there was one decoration that one could find now is anything related the film The Nightmare Before Christmas. For example, I recently went to a Hallowe'en themed store (since I don't put stock in the commercial side of Halloween, I won't dignify this store by saying its name; especially since someone could use this a product placement for them) and saw an animatronic Skeleton Jack who says phrases from the movie. Standing in a store with ghoulish animatrons and set ups that Dante, Poe, and Lovecraft, possibly Giger, could have imagined, it would be funny to see this tall skeleton wish you a Merry Christmas. But that leads me to the movie its self and to show how this movie is a good example of why one shouldn't yoke an ox with an ass.

    The movie is Tim Burton's take on the animated shows that were Holiday themed and aired on television as he was growing up, like Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Frosty the Snowman, and Here Comes Peter Cottontail. All are alike in how they bring up a secular (except for The Little Drummer Boy) world in the holiday themed movie that is easily seen as a commercial for the candy and card companies. Yet, Burton apparently decided to make a little story that served as the basis for the movie after seeing Christmas decorations replace Hallowe'en ones in a store, plus the story How the Grinch Stole Christmas. So, he crafted a simple story of a skeleton named Jack who decided, one day, to bring Christmas to Hallowe'en by taking it over. What happens next is he has Santa Claus replaced by himself and makes his own sleigh and reindeer, and goes out to deliver presents, only to have it all blow up in his face. Santa comes to Jack and lets him know of his mistake and fixes everything up and everyone is back in his proper place. The movie, of course, expands on this.
    First, the movie opens by bringing the viewer into a forest with a couple of trees. A narrator then claims the story takes places in a world with holiday themed countries, all of which are accessible through their themed doors. Of course, you see the familiar images of them that are often presented in cards: Valentine's has the shape of a heart, St. Patricks a shamrock, Easter an egg, Thanksgiving a turkey, and Christmas a Christmas tree. Then we see that Hallowe'en is represented by a Jack o'lantern (not the original turnip made but the American one with the pumpkin). One thing to note is despite showing holidays Americans are familiar with and using the American fruit that lanterns are carved from, we don't see a representation of Independence Day among the trees, or Mother's Day, Father's Day, or even Mardi Gras. All of these are just as commercialized as Hallowe'en and Christmas, but thankfully they kept Thanksgiving in the frame.
   The idea of a land of Holiday themed countries sounds good, but it is never really explored. Not only that, the narrator says it took place long ago, but the film's climax has modern day cities. Yet, I can't figure out an excuse for that while having what looks like a quaint American town set up in the House of Hades. This last is Hallowe'en Town, a ghoulish, simple American town where ghosts and goblins live, the cemetery is the main feature, and trees are all dead. Most frequently, the town is shown at night, with a fog and a full moon, to add another Gothic element to the mix. Christmas Town is shown as the foil. It's presented as a winter wonderland, not too different from those decorations you might see in the stores, but downsized. Apparently, both towns live for their respected holidays as the movie opens with the denizens of Hallowe'en singing about All Hallows' Eve in the accurately titled song "This Is Hallowe'en". After the number, they declare it over and all praise Jack for orchestrating what he calls their "most horrible yet". Next, he goes to Christmas and sees that already are the elves making toys for Santa as the count down to Christmas Eve begins.
    One thing I can't really believe in the opening narration is it is said the film takes place long ago in this Holiday World, yet when we see Jack's Christmas Eve flight we are suddenly in Modern America. That I can't think of any explanation that would work for everyone. 

   A couple of things are hard to digest in rewatches as a Catholic. For example, the movie is incredibly secular. Jack never comes upon a Creche while in Christmas Town, and the reason why it's called Christmas Town is never brought up. Nor is there anything of a religion in Hallowe'en or mention of soul cakes. At the same time, we have a cemetery in Hallowe'en Town with some tombstones being crosses, but no chapel next to it. There's not even a church there (and I'll add also that there doesn't seem to be anything related to Druidism or Wicca there either). Jack swears "by God" twice in one song, but that is the only time we hear of God. When Jack sings his lament, there is a line that makes no sense. It goes "I'm a master of fright, I'm a demon of light"[2] This bothers me lately as demons are not really associated with the light, but darkness. I know in Ancient Greece the demon had a different connotation, but the demon is largely seen as a harmful spirit that often bothers people. Even the word demon comes from Greek, Daimon, to mean "divide", which matches well to the statement "fighting our inner demons" as they divide us from goodness. They can be seen in allegories where demons take shape in addictions, in lust, in anger, and in mental defects. The lyric in the song, "Jack's Lament", changes this and implies he is a eudaimon, which means "good demon", a term that doesn't make sense to a Christian perspective. It's a Catch-22 that has come up: if an angel rebels against God it is a fallen angel (which Christianity also claims demons to be fallen angels), yet if a demon parted from the Devil and repented it's not really a demon.
    Jack's title as Pumpkin King, a self-proclaimed "demon of light", makes the character come off as Lucifer, yet he is meant be Everyman in a moral play. While he likes the fact that he can scare people away (hey, he's a walking, talking skeleton of a man, after all) he tires of the way things remain. His lament expresses this as he sees the same Hallowe'en doing the same old thing. So he walks out of the town on Hallowe'en Night and goes searching for something new. The next morning, he finds the forest with the trees and of all the doors to choose from, he picked Christmas. Jack is then transported to Christmas Town for his number "What's This?", which is about the least ghoulish song in the movie. In it, Jack sees all the traditions associated with Christmas, but like I said he doesn't come upon a Creche (Might have lead to a case of, "what's this? A woman near a manger / What's this? a sleeping baby is in there!" and noting the Three Kings and Shepherds, plus the Angel and a Star, then wonders why it's filling him with warm feelings). No, Jack only sees the town, the animals, the children, the trees, and the snow (he even takes a bite of a snow ball that almost resembles a marshmallow). He also believes that Santa Claus, calling him "Sandy Claws" like some children would, is the ruler of Christmas Town. So, like an explorer who went to a different country, he comes back with souvenirs and shows them to his friends, only none seem to understand in his eyes. Neither does he, for he begins to try to find a rational explanation for Christmas to the people whose sole purpose is to be frightful. Eventually, Jack abandons that and thinks that it should all be shared and that is when he gets a new idea.
   So, the plot is that Jack is bring Christmas to Hallowe'en, or rather bring Hallowe'en to Christmas, however way you see it. His way of doing that is by taking it over in what could be seen as an adult as a coup de'tat. But the denizens of Hallowe'en hop aboard with it. During "Making Christmas" a group of vampires make a duck toy, a mad scientist brings up undead reindeer, and Sally, a ragdoll girl with a crush on Jack, makes him his suit. Sally has her own subplot that even the guy in Hollywood's War on God would have plenty to say about. She was created by a wheel chair bound scientist who exhibits a Frankenstein complex, complete with Igor, and comes off as overbearing. However, Sally doesn't simply want to be a "dutiful daughter" of his and tries to go out frequently and he doesn't want to. After the opening number, it's revealed she slipped deadly nightshade into his drink and ran off. She does it again to see the town meeting, and he grounds her upon recovery (personally, I don't know how it is he tolerates her or why he needs her when he has Igor). Eventually, she sneaks out the window and falls down, a la Lucifer from Heaven, and the Doctor forgets all about her as he makes a new creation. As opposed to winding up in her own Hell, Sally gains paradise in her rebellion by becoming the voice of reason in Jack's take over of Christmas and ultimately heroic (sort of). She becomes the voice of reason after seeing a vision of destruction. However, Jack doesn't heed her and has the trio of kids, the Boogie Boys (one of them is girl, though), kidnap Santa. The last part I always find amazing as Santa has a song that says "He sees you when you're sleeping, he knows when you're awake / He knows if you've been bad or good..."[3] which suggests him to be omnipresent (something I discussed in "St. Nick vs Santa Claus"), and yet he didn't know the Boogie Boys were coming. Wouldn't their names already be on the naughty list and Santa be waiting for them? (Speaking of names, they are named Lock, Shock, and Barrel, a parody of the phrase "lock, stock, and barrel"). At least, this instance brings him down to that of a man. Even Jack gets it when he discovers Santa doesn't have claws like he thought he did. Jack then takes over his holiday duties as gift giver and goes out on his sleigh ride (plus Zero, when the fog is thick enough to keep Jack from flying, like with Rudolf the Red Nosed Reindeer). Of course, Jack's gift giving results in chaos and the military mobilizes. Finally, Jack gets shot out of the sky and he finally learns his lesson that Christmas and Hallowe'en don't mix.
   There comes a point in How the Grinch Stole Christmas where the Whos in Whoville find everything taken as the Grinch predicted, yet they stand out in the town square and sing joyfully anyway. This tells the Grinch that despite what he had done Christmas still came and realizes "maybe Christmas...doesn't come from a store. Maybe Christmas, perhaps, means a little bit more."[4] We don't get that in A Nightmare Before Christmas. When Jack is shot down, Hallowe'en Town goes into mourning for their fallen king while in Christmas, Santa's absence leads to the authorities to cancel Christmas to the shock and grief of all. Even Jack hears it and repents of his ruining of the holiday. "Poor Jack" has him starting with this and saying he didn't intend it to happen this way, almost as if Tim Burton was speaking through him on how his works were intended to entertain and critics have made it something it wasn't. He then decides he knows who he really is and what he was meant for.
     Of course, the movie deviates from Burton's source material from this point. The Boogie Boys are heard plotting to kidnap Santa by the Boogie Man, known as Oogie Boogie. Santa is brought to Oogie Boogie who is gloats over him in his "Boogie Song". To me, Oogie Boogie was created to give the movie a villain, though not very active one, considering how he doesn't show up until half way into the movie, and with no formal introduction. He falls under the category of a trope, that is not in the TV trope website, I'd like to call Villain in a Coffin, or Vampire Villain for short. This type of villain is usually an exceptionally powerful character, practically able to destroy the world if he wanted to. Yet, this power has weakened his body greatly and is killing him, so he has to isolate himself in a chamber to prevent his demise, leaving minions and underlings to do his evil deeds. Oogie Boogie falls under this in many strokes: he spends his screen time under the house of the Boogie Boys, as though he were Satan in Hell (in Dante sense, the Boogie Boys are the three beasts the poet comes across in Inferno) and while being terrifying, he is fragile. He never fights Jack directly, mostly just avoiding him when they meet, and all it takes is Jack pulling a seam (revealing him to be nothing but a sand bag containing bugs) and he falls apart, literally. Yet, in his time, he threatens Santa with death, though it is delayed like a standard Bond villain would have it. Sally rescues him with her trick of coming apart and coming back together, but it wears off fast and she's captured. With her hands and leg off, she's vulnerable and this is something they were wise to keep from the movie. So, it's Jack who comes to the rescue to set things right. The rescue of Santa, and Sally, was added obviously to add more tension to the movie. At least, Santa is permitted to squash the remaining bug in the name of Christmas. However, I still wonder why the Boogie Boys are not given any punishments for their actions? For the most part, they are practically let off the hook and they never get a lump of coal.
     Once everyone, and everything, is back in its proper place, there doesn't seem to be any ill will. Santa flies over Hallowe'en Town and gives them the gift of snowfall while Jack has gotten holiday usurpation out of his system. There is a nice moment in this kind of peace offering where Santa and Jack exchange their holiday greetings, showing Hallowe'en and Christmas have mended all bridges and they can be good friends while staying in their places. Of course, this moral is somewhat out the window with the snowfall in Hallowe'en Town and the denizens singing a reprise of "What's This?" while doing hockey and snow ball fights. Jack even finds Sally in the snow covered cemetery and reveals his feelings for her (despite the lack of any build up to it) which closes the film with the implication that Peace, Love, and Joy have a spot in Hallowe'en.

   For the most part, there is little to no mention of the meaning of holidays. The prologue claims they come from a magical world with trees that have doors. The secular nature prevents someone from being like Linus and recite a passage from scripture when Jack wonders on Christmas. He laments on how no one in town understand it, yet he can't seem to get the meaning of it either. A few times, he seems to want to bring it up only to drop it for entertainment. The same with Hallowe'en where none of the town's denizens mention a founder or why they are what they are. Instead, it's a town where people talk of scaring everyone and everything, just like in Monsters Inc where the characters live to scare people. Even with the Disney and Touchstone logo, The Nightmare Before Christmas is still a commercial for card companies and candy companies. It wasn't really all that great when it first came out, but it has gained a cult following when it was aired on ABC Family, now called Freeform, along with another Halloween classic, Hocus Pocus. Both movies were about someone seeking out a meaning in holidays, which makes it ironic that the said television channel is using them as Hallowe'en themed commercials (more so with Nightmare as it is also considered a Christmas movie). Even for that, there are few good merits for the film to make it a classic that it is.
    The movie does contain some artistic expressions in the scenes, especially in terms of color. Black, gray, red, and orange are common in Hallowe'en Town, mostly to denote the deathly looks of the town with a touch of Fall. Christmas Town is given white and blue for the winter, with tradition green and red, along with silver and gold. Both towns are shown frequently at night, as Hallowe'en night is the time for trick'o treating and Christmas is just after the Winter Solstice. The ghouls of Hallowe'en and the deathly atmosphere give it a feel of a ghost town in a literal sense. This in contrast to the elf inhabited Christmas Town, largely to show a contrast between life and death. As to the towns, Hallowe'en is filled with German expressionism while Christmas can be seen as being like Dr. Seuss.
    The music is another thing that has lasted long. The opening number, "This is Hallowe'en", is memorable, though the flaw I find in it is it introduces to us characters by name who have almost nothing to do with the plot. The One Hiding Under Your Stairs gets a cameo, but we don't see The One Hiding Under Your Bed in body while the Clown With the Tear-Away Face is little more than an extra. Some who actually do things are not mentioned by name, such as the vampires, the werewolf, the harlequin demon, the glob man, and the witches. The Shadow of the Moon resembles Oogie Boogie, but nothing is used to explain that in the film. I will say one of the characters is made as a joke: the Mayor. The Mayor has a happy face with a manly voice for the most part, but it turns to a gloomy and depressed one with a whiny voice when the mood strikes him, a play on the phrase "two faced" (in fact, it goes on the idea of politicians being two faced). Jack has not one but four solo numbers in the movie. "Jack's Lament" and "Poor Jack" are effectively soliloquies as they permit the audience to hear Jack's thoughts in each case (the first of them establishes his character). "What's This?" and "What Does It Mean?" are his way of trying figure out Christmas. Sally also gets her number, "Sally's Song" where she speaks of not only her feelings but also her concern for Jack, having seen the vision of Christmas ending in disaster. Then the Boogie Boys sing "Kidnap the Sandy Claws", while Oogie Boogie sing "The Boogie Song", both of which fall into the category of Disney villain songs, though not included in some lists. One thing interesting is the song "Making Christmas", which is done to the tune of "Dies Irae". "Dies Irae" was a Gregorian chant, done mostly as a requiem in funerals. The title is Latin for "Day of Judgement" and it has been translated by many Classical composers, such as Berlioz in his Symphonie Fantastique and Verdi. In Danny Elfman, it becomes "Making Christmas", an irony that a Christmas song would be sung to a chant done in funerals (it'd be funnier if someone actually played it in a wedding as opposed to the "Ave Maria" or "Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring"). Then again, who is to say this is a first. I mean, have you ever heard of "Happy X-Mass", "I Believe in Father Christmas", or "Christmas At Ground Zero"? Hardly jolly enough songs and yet they are considered Christmas songs.
    If there is one good thing to close off, it's that Tim Burton has not given this movie any sequels, which is a good enough defiance to commercializing of holidays.


For additional information on Hallowe'en and Christmas:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas
http://www.history.com/topics/halloween/history-of-halloween
http://www.history.com/topics/christmas/history-of-christmas
Notes.

1. Deuteronomy 2:10
2. "Jack's Lament" The Nightmare Before Christmas. Tim Burton. Danny Elfman. 1993.
3. "Santa Claus Is Coming to Town".  Coots and Gillespie. 1934.
4. Dr. Seuss. How the Grinch Stole Christmas. Random House. 1957.

Saturday, October 7, 2017

Frankenstein: Who is the Monster and Who is the Man?

 
    How do you do, 

   To start the countdown to Allhallowtide (or, as the non-Catholic readers would know it as, Hallowe'en -- which precedes All Saints' and All Souls' Day) I will reveal that every year, between this season and the Autumn Equinox, I commence to a binge reading of dark and spooky works. I don't have a particular order in this, unlike in most reading binges, which means I could start with just about anything. I could begin with Washington Irving's "Legend of Sleepy Hallow" and jump ahead to Poe's poems and stories, just as I would do with the American literature. Then it's fast fowarding to 1911 with Gaston Leroux's The Phantom of the Opera. I sometimes add in Oscar Wilde's Picture of Dorian Gray in the mix and Nathan Hawthorne's House of the Seven Gables as they contain dark themes. Some years even include Goethe's Faust, mostly with the grim scenes in the first part's climax, along with H.G. Wells' The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, and The War of the Worlds, and Stephen King's Carrie was included when I was in high school and college. Recently, I even included H.P. Lovecraft's "The Call of Cthuhlu" and Dante's Inferno (since it takes place in Hell, it does count as a kind of Medieval haunted house feel). At some point, I eventually reach Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Or the Modern Prometheus, one of my favorite novels in English literature. 
    Technically speaking, almost anything written or published after Christ rose from the dead and ascended into Heaven has some degree of darkness, including the Revelations of St. John that provides one of the darkest chapters in the Bible (the days when Satan will be at his peak power and the evil in the world will be at the worst, while the faithful face their greatest challenge ever, and finally the End of the World). In Western Literatures, you can mark the trend from the Fall of Rome (as Petrarch named the period as the Dark Ages) with darkness as a sign of chaos and light of God brought forth in the heroes, such as in the epic of Beowulf and the Norse sagas. It later transfers down into the Medieval period, especially in wake of the Black Death, and the foreboding theme of death echoes through many works. Shakespeare wasn't immune to this as evidenced by his three darkest plays: MacBeth, Hamlet, and King Lear. Somewhere in this evolution of story telling, the core of the Christian doctrine (being resurrection of Christ who will bring a resurrection of the dead in the Second Coming) has become perverted with stories of the dead walking among us, and with the undead coming forth, all of which cause chills in our spines and goosebumps on our skins. In short, European literatures have some fascination with death and darkness, which is still present today (think of Harry Potter's chief antagonist, Lord Vordemort, who's name means "Fly from Death", and is also the embodiment of Death itself). So, when it comes to the clash of life and death in the realm of light and darkness, a discussion of Mary Shelley's novel comes into being as it deals with those themes, while also taking on other themes. 

    Imagine, female readers out there, you and your husband are newlyweds going on a vacation in the Alps. Once there, you meet up with the famous man of letters, George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron, or Lord Byron as most call him. He and Mister Polidori are vacationing near lake Geneva and you and your husband meet up with him. You have plans of using this retreat for nature hikes, boat rides, and some sports you know of in the meadow. However, upon arrival, the weather goes from pleasant and sunny to rainy and wintry. What the heck? you wonder. It's June, the start of summer, and it's freezing outside. Who turned off the summer? Welcome to Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death, as we in America call it. So, instead of doing all those things mentioned, you are stuck inside, keeping warm by the fire with glasses of sherry, and reading a few ghost stories of German origin translated into French. Then, Lord Byron decides to host a constant where everyone will come up with a ghost story that is original. You hear the men tell all sorts while you busy yourself with one. Then, one night, you dream of seeing "the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together"[1] which is put into motion by incredible means, then seek out his creator who fled from the creation and try to reach out to him at the bed curtains. This is enough to wake you up and narrate the scene to the men. 
   If this story is about you, your name would be Mary Wolstonecraft Shelley, nee Godwin, named after the feminist writer of the late 18th Century, 19 years old and wife of the poet Percy Shelley (admit it, you saw the footnote and panned down to take a look). Mrs. Shelley dreamed up the scene that later became chapter five of the novel, Frankenstein. She evidently was encouraged by her husband to expand on the scene and it became a short, three part novel, finally published in 1818, which means it will turn two hundred years in 2018. Over the two centuries since it was first published, Shelley's break out book (or not since all of her later works didn't match the power of Frankenstein and were forgotten) has been translated into many languages, adapted to plays and movies. We all know of the 1931 movie starring Boris Karloff as Frankenstein's creation and the franchise that spawned forth of the robotic giant, with scars and bolts, walking toward you. There are also the lesser known Hammer films with Peter Cushing of Star Wars fame playing Doctor Frankenstein, and one had his fellow Star Wars costar, David Prowse, play his creation. 1994 saw Sir Kenneth Branagh team up with Robert De Niro in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Then there are the loose adaptations like Young Frankenstein (a spoof on the Karloff movies, mostly), Rocky Horror Show, and Frankenweenie (in which a kid resurrects his dog). More recently, American author, Dean Koontz, made a re-imagining of Frankenstein and even titled it that way. First time readers of Shelley's novel may or may not be familiar with all these, but they would be in for a few surprises upon opening it up. 

   For starters, contrary to the Universal films, the setting doesn't happen in Transylvania. In the book, Victor Frankenstein states he is Gevenese, though born in Naples[2]. He creates his "monster" not in Geneva, either, but in the University of Ingolstadt, in Bavaria (today part of Germany). The setting switches between Switzerland and Germany a couple of times, with one visit to the British Isles, before climaxing in the White Sea. Another thing to surprise the reader is in the name. Frankenstein is not the name of the Creature, despite the popular branding of him. Frankenstein is the name of his creator. The book offers no name to him, but he does say to Frankenstein "I ought to be thy Adam"[3], a reference to the first man, created in the image of God, yet is called "Devil" by his creator which made him reference his status as a fallen angel[4]. Third, Shelley offers no description of how the monster was brought to life. She doesn't even give us a clue to how he was fashioned together. It's basically we see the sausage but never see how its made, if we could use that phrase. And there is a fourth surprise: the hunchback assistant Igor who populates the image of a mad scientist who is compared to Frankenstein does not exist in the book. 
  In fact, Frankenstein hardly resembles the mad scientist sort. He is often called Doctor Frankenstein, yet he is still a student in Ingolstadt when he made his creation. That is basically like calling Howard in The Big Bang Theory as Doctor Wolowitz, despite the fact that he is an engineer with a masters. Frankenstein did go into the university to study chemistry (or alchemy, as it was called), but later switched to poetry. The thing of him creating his creation is more about wanting to make another break through in science: to conquer death. That basically leads us to the subtitle: "The Modern Prometheus." 
   First, get rid of the movie you saw back in 2012. Prometheus was a titan in Greek Mythology who created Man out of clay. He then stole fire from the gods as humans were less likely to survive than animals who had the best gifts around. For that, Zeus had him chained to a mountain in the Caucasians and his liver would be pecked by ravens. Prometheus had also taught humans to offer poor quality sacrifices to Zeus and keep the meats for themselves, which angered the god farther. Prometheus stayed there until Heracles, son of Zeus, came along and freed him. Since Antiquity, the legend of Prometheus is more than the Greek retelling of the Discovery of Fire. A being dares to take what belonged to heaven, even with the intention of aiding the lowly in the process, which is still an act of theft, and is thus cast down and given a harsh punishment. For most of the history of Europe, the thought stayed on as it seemed an example of "Thou shalt not steal", until the Romantic period (of which the Shelleys and Lord Byron are a part of) came along and re-translated the legend to be anti-authoritarian. The fire that the gods hold is suddenly the key to the lowly becoming equal to the high, yet the people above don't want it shared and thus the hero takes it away and upsets the delicate balance. Two generations later, German philosopher, Frederic Nietzsche, made Prometheus a tragic figure in rebellion against the universe, yet is defeated and brought down. Of course, the Romantics understood the danger to this deed and showed it. A generation prior, William Blake had Bromion take Oothoon from Theotorman in Visions of the Daughters of Albion and he winds up chained with her and suffer remorse for his actions[5]. In the same instance, Mary Shelley has Victor Frankenstein take the ability to create life from God through science and winds up doing that cliched phrase "created a monster". 
    One thing with Frankenstein is also seen in the name: Victor. It is an obvious parody of victor, as in winner, but it leans more toward the vicar, a clergyman. Take also the surname being of German origin, meaning "Stone of the Franks", than you basically get the name that means "Vicar, Stone of the Franks". Before he creates his creation, Frankenstein starts out as the doted child of a loving couple. He has two brothers named Ernest and William, a cousin named Elizabeth, to whom he falls in love with, plus his best friend, Henry Clerval. These are English names, as Shelley was writing to English readers, so we can't doubt Elizabeth actually was christened Isabella while Henry was Henri or Heinrich, and Ernest was Ernst. Frankenstein spends many days of his childhood reading, which leads to Shelley making discourses on philosophical works that happen in the narrative (if they don't interest you, you can skim them over, though I don't really recommend it). One can see why Stephen King compared it to "a college dormitory bull session"[6] when reading it over. After reading and studying, he goes to Ingolstadt for higher learning, which makes him run into two professors, Messers. Krempe and Waldman, who stand in for the faculty of the institution (my interpretation of it, as I don't think they ever existed). Waldman is the one who takes Frankenstein on to his path of infamy, especially with this speech: 
"The ancient teachers of this science," he said, "promised impossibilities and performed nothing. The modern masters promise very little;...But these philosophers...have indeed performed miracles."[7]
   The speech is very biased against Ancient sciences, especially against the Greeks who coined the word. We know now that the ancients were able to invent things to benefit man, charted the universe, constructed structures, and created ways of solving equations. What the modern scientist does is merely follow in their footsteps, sometimes standing on the shoulders of genius. What made the men Waldman spoke of fascinating was how they were able to demystify the world after centuries of seeing it one way. They did prove that the sun and the earth weren't supported by giants, but by gravity (as well as the earth going around the sun, instead of the other way around), that lightning is electricity and an atmospheric discharge, and so on. It would seem that science has taken the magic out of the world, becoming the light to replace darkness, and expose the ghosts as nothing but illusions. I shouldn't have to add that Ingolstadt is also the place where the Illuminati was formed, met for a while, and then was disbanded, roughly in the time frame of the book's story, and its name means "light." 
    This light now entices Frankenstein take the next step, going along with what Dr. Ian Malcolm is saying in Jurassic Park (which shares many themes with Frankenstein). Instead of making a quote and placing a footnote, why not just watch this clip and listen for yourself. But, after that and taking some knowledge of mixing chemicals to make the elixir of life, Frankenstein goes out finds pieces of a human corpse and makes something out of them while the year flies away. This is not coming up with getting a baby to live outside of its mother's womb or to keep the body of a person gone vegetable kicking; he is using parts and parcels of people who lived their lives and were selected to die. Yet, he uses those pieces to bring together a reanimated man. Then, he brings it to life and realizes too late he made a mistake. In this period where men were rationally explaining away the existence of demons, imps, witches, and ghouls, all of a sudden, we got a demon that lives and breathes like any mortal creature. 

    The Creature is a very interesting character to walk the pages of English literature. He is a stark contrast to Boris Karloff's interpretation. He is big, but he is not a robot or a zombie (if anything, he could be likened to the Revenent, an undead creature that dies but is brought back to life). He evokes the image of the Egyptian god Osiris, who was killed and mutilated, but put back together and resurrected. Yet, where Osiris remains the same when he comes back, the Creature here begins as a newborn lamb. 
    While we may call him Frankenstein, that is not really his name. In the book, he is constantly referred to as Demon, Wretch, and, one time, Devil. Monster is the common name used, though he hardly seems like it. Creature is the working name, though it does dehumanize him somewhat. Another is Creation, which is also dehumanizing. The only logic to naming him Frankenstein is largely to make a kind of paternity between him and his creator, though by that logic Adam would have been called Adam, Son of God, in scripture and we'd all be bearing the title "Son / Daughter of God" in our names. So, basically, the Creature has no name, mostly as Frankenstein never thought to give him one and just referred to him by degrading terms. 
    The Creature leaves Ingolstadt and resides in the country, allowing for the Pasterol setting so familiar in Romantic arts to appear in the novel. He sees nature at work and learns how to support himself as no one is around to help him. During his life, he figures out how to make fire and how to acquire food, becoming a strict vegetarian who lives on nuts and berries. One day, he comes upon a cottage and watches a family consisting of an old man and his children, named the De Laceys. One day, they are joined by an Arabian woman named Safie, who the youth, Felix, is attached to. Through this setting, the Creature learns how to talk and read, eventually reading great works of literature in the process. He also learns of Man and the good and the bad of the human race. Finally, he learns of his creation and how even his own creator hates him.
   If there is one thing modern readers may find not so PC in this section is the constant appearance of discrimination. The Creature comes off as an analog to the era being that Shelley wrote at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, which were preceded by the French Revolution, which was in turn foreshadowed by the Age of Enlightenment, as though the Revolution and its ideals were the monster made by the thinking of Voltaire and Franklin. As Shelley was writing, Britain was in the Industrial Revolution which was sweeping Europe also, radically changing life. Political movements to dominate the century had their beginnings at this time like feminism and liberalism, both of which have created their own monsters. Some things in the novel can seem dated, especially the knowledge the Creature obtains. The history he learns is slanted toward the Europeans and the subplot of Felix and Safie presents two types of Muslim characters: the exotic Arab and the treacherous Turk. These do have some purpose to 19th century readers as the Ottoman Empire was still a power at the start while Arabia had not had many visitors from Europe since the Crusades. The exotic Arab is in Safie whose beauty attracts a young Frenchman named Felix De Lacey. The treacherous Turk is her father who promises her to Felix, only to go back on it after being freed from justice at the ruining of his potential in law's family. The portrayal might seem slanderous to Muslim readers, but it serves a purpose to let the Creature see Man's dark side, which gives him one in turn. The Creature also learns of poverty and classism while near the cottage, which enables Shelley to make a commentary on society itself.
    So, the Creature holds up a mirror for the reader, regardless of his skin color or religious beliefs, his political stance or his orientation, and asks the reader look at oneself and examine those stances, as opposed to picking something for a stance. He could say how he is excluded because he is one of his kind and how the actions of people have made him this way, pointing it out in every form. Imagine how the Creature might react to our current society, especially having something to say about recent tragedies and our leaders.
   When the Creature tries to communicate with the cottagers, it starts out with some awkwardness as he never got a chance to socialize, and even the Blind Man's children scorn him. He seeks out Frankenstein and kills William during his tenure, thus making in a matter of chapters the corruption of a soul that happens without will. The Creature wasn't born to be wicked, but circumstances made him that way. He only wanted companionship, but because of his ugliness he gets turned away at all turns and even harmed when he does one good thing (can you imagine Superman getting shot at for rescuing Lois? by one of her friends?). But, worst of all, to the Creature's mind, is that his own creator has spurned him and now he can offer nothing but torment to Frankenstein. So, after reading the book, it's hard to not watch the speech in Young Frankenstein that the Creature gives to keep the mob from killing Frederick, or that Apple commercial where the Creature attempts to sing "Home For the Holidays" to a crowd of tree gawkers, without getting misty in the eye, for in both examples he gets that warm welcome he had long sought out. Even that Hugh Jackman movie, Van Helsing, has the Creature becoming heroic. 
     This is not what happens in the book, though. The Creature requests a companion of Frankenstein with the promise that he would leave Europe for South America and they would be content. However, Frankenstein goes back on his promise and destroys the work, just as Safie's father went back on his promise to Felix. The Creature then declares war by murdering Henry and later Elizabeth, in his promise "I shall be with you on your wedding day". You can just imagine that in this day and age, such a threat would be taken serious and you would think a restraining order or something would help. Of course, how would you explain to the judge that you want a restraining order to someone who was just a year ago a corpse that you brought back to life. You might get dismissed from the court room as a loon. This is also why Frankenstein held his silence when William was murdered and the nanny, Justine, was punished. An innocent woman is executed for the crimes by another, in a portrayal of the justice system (note the pun, Justine and justice) that comes across as Anti-Catholic at times -- she is threatened into confessing the murder by the confessor and the confession is a lie.
     Eventually, Frankenstein is left with only Ernest alive and he chases the Creature into Russia and then up north. Shelley opens and closes the book with Captain Robert Walton and his expedition in the North Pole, which follows closely the plot of The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner (even with the mention of the Albatross). Just like in the movie, Titanic (1997), the book ended scenes feature a man searching for something (Walton's case is adventure to the unknown as shown with the North Pole) while probing the Arctic with a ship manned by Russians. Then he meets a character who narrates the story, thus making it a story within a story, plus another through the Creature's narrative. Frankenstein dies of hypothermia and the Creature repents of his deeds. He waxes poetic of his deeds to Walton and vows to die up in the North Pole, thus ending the book as a downer. Both Frankenstein and his Creature die cut off from humanity, for the former matches to Prometheus. 

    Frankenstein; Or the Modern Prometheus is not a long book. It's 196 pages long (fifteen of which are devoted to the two introductions) split across three parts and twenty four chapters. That doesn't sound like much, you might think, but why did it take two years for Mary Shelley to publish all that? The publishing process was a little different then. It was published in a serial form, originally. As to the style, if you took out all of the philosophical digressions and angst passages, plus shrink the backstory of Frankenstein down some, the book would be vastly shorter, barely passing the 100 page marker. The dialogue is poetic sounding with the Creature's initial speech to Frankenstein sounding like that of a prayer (he uses Thee and Thy when addressing him the way a priest does to God). I will say Shelley is able to make a representation of men in the book better than she does with her fellow women, which seems surprising. Elizabeth and Justine, plus Caroline Frankenstein, are the main women in the book whose roles are fleeting and tragic as they die off one by one. Agatha and Safie are brought up in the Creature's narrative as either the dutiful daughter or the damsel. At the same time, the men are little more than symbols: the professors being the Pan like tempters, Henry is the boyhood friend, and so on. The only really fleshed out characters are Victor Frankenstein, his Creation, and Captain Walton, who each seek something. Walton and the Creature are seeking a companion and Walton shares Frankenstein's quest for glory. It should be pointed out the truly fleshed out characters are the ones narrating the book.
    Looking over the book, Mary Shelley is able to create scenes of desolation and horror, especially once the Creature has been created. The first four chapters are spent on setting up Frankenstein and his ambition to conquer death. Chapter four mentions him raiding charnel houses, slaughter houses, and dissecting rooms[8] just to get the pieces of the body, as opposed to simply unearthing a dead man and using the body for his experiment. Then comes chapter five, from which point things get dark, including the pivot-able scene of the Creature coming to life. The moment is a parody of the Creation of Adam, even making an inverse where the Creation holds out the hand to the Creator. When the Creature narrates his tale, we seen pastoral scenes of nature, that makes one thing of paintings. Even Frankenstein's ascent of Mont Blanc is like the painting of the man on the mountain. It gets dreary afterward, finally climaxing with Elizabeth's murder that is done to the style of the painting "Nightmare." Thus the light and dark of the Romantic period is exploited with artistic imagery in the text.
   When looking about the story, one common image pops up in the descriptions: ice. Remember, Shelley was inspired to write Frankenstein in the summer of 1816, which was the Year Without a Summer. Through out the book, you see this image of snow and ice that often makes the book feel cold: the book opens and closes in the North Pole, with Walton's ship trapped by ice, the Creature spends his early days in the cold, Frankenstein climbs Mont Blanc and scales its glaciers, and the Creature dies alone in a frozen waste land. It also matches to Dante's Inferno where, instead of the usual fire and brimestone you get in a Sunday sermon, Hell is shown as a giant, dark, eternal freezer with a lake of ice holding the worst of sinners. Frost brought that up in his "Fire and Ice" by stating:
If it had to perish twice, I think I know enough hate, / to say for destruction ice is also great / and would suffice.[9]
    Light and darkness. Fire and ice. Contrasts of the matter are present in stories, with European literature consisting of darkness frequently. The darkness of death is present in Frankenstein where Victor Frankenstein sees it as the ultimate enemy to beat. The irony was his action of creating life to beat death resulted in more death as the Creature does murder, either deliberately or inadvertently. Of course, it is Frankenstein whose soul bleeds from this as it was him who set the events into motion. The Creature never sought to murder people, not at first. All he wanted was companionship. However, coming upon a dark world as this where people are repelled by ugliness (even today, where good looking guys could get away with certain actions and racial profiling is rampant in major cities) makes it harder and it breaks his heart. So, he becomes a monster. At the same time, could he really be a monster? Or as Disney's The Hunchback of Notre Dame had us decide: "who is the monster and who is the man?"[10]
     One thing to add is the book Frankenstein turns 200 years old next year. 


1: Shelley, Mary, Frankenstein. 1818 Author's Introduction (1831). pg. x-xi.
2: Shelley. pg. 33
3: Shelley. pg. 95.
4: Ibid.
5: Blake, William, Visions of the Daughters of Albion. 1793.
6: King, Stephen. Introduction to Frankenstein, Dracula, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Signet Classic. 1978. pg. vii.
7: Shelley, Mary, Frankenstein. pg. 47.
8: Shelley. pg. 53.
9: Frost, Robert. "Fire and Ice."
10: "The Bells of Notre Dame", Alan Menkin. 1996.