How do you do,
In the early 20th Century and late 19th, they would often make a series of books that would follow up the original novel as there wasn't any other way of learning more about the hero, or to see another generation sort. In the United States, we saw that after Tom Sawyer had his adventures, we then had Huckleberry Finn. We also had The Wonderful Wizard of Oz lead off a parade of "Oz Books" that continued even after L. Frank Baum passed away. So, L. M. Montgomery did go serial because everyone wanted to hear more about Anne, Diana, Gilbert, Marilla, and the rest. The thing is, when you have a book that is about an orphan girl who is adopted by an elderly couple and she grows up into a hard working woman, that is basically a tough act to follow when writing a sequel. But, Mrs. Montgomery managed to pull it all off. After Anne of Green Gables, we are reunited with Anne of Avonlea.
In book two, we find Anne is almost grown up and teaching in the Avonlea school house (after the new teacher in the first book moved on). Just look at the picture above and note how the illustration of the cover has her professionally dressed, in contrast to the first. This allows the introductions of the children there: the young Paul Irving from the States, Anthony Pye, St. Clair Donnell (whose mother insists we pronounce as "Donnell"), and a few others. The book also introduces Mr. Harrison, who is almost like George C. Scott in my opinion (I can imagine Scott playing him in my own casting movie -- even add in the line "no more Mr. Nice Guy!") when he first appears and then softens a bit. Then there's Miss Lavendar, the former fiancée of Paul's father who is now over the hill due to problems obstructing their journey to the altar. Basically, all the things that a sequel does, bring back familiar characters and have them interact with new ones coming in and have them deal with new problems.
In book two, we find Anne is almost grown up and teaching in the Avonlea school house (after the new teacher in the first book moved on). Just look at the picture above and note how the illustration of the cover has her professionally dressed, in contrast to the first. This allows the introductions of the children there: the young Paul Irving from the States, Anthony Pye, St. Clair Donnell (whose mother insists we pronounce as "Donnell"), and a few others. The book also introduces Mr. Harrison, who is almost like George C. Scott in my opinion (I can imagine Scott playing him in my own casting movie -- even add in the line "no more Mr. Nice Guy!") when he first appears and then softens a bit. Then there's Miss Lavendar, the former fiancée of Paul's father who is now over the hill due to problems obstructing their journey to the altar. Basically, all the things that a sequel does, bring back familiar characters and have them interact with new ones coming in and have them deal with new problems.
Anne of Avonlea is not really the best of the sequels to follow someone, in my humble opinion. It's not the same was with Mark Twain where the sequel is just as good as the first, or even considered of equal worth in the literary canon. With Anne, only the first book is treated a classic literature while the sequels are less so. There is a justifiable reason to that; just as American literature classes wouldn't go beyond Last of the Mohicans in discussing Cooper, most Canadian literature classes probably talk about only Anne of Green Gables when speaking of Montgomery and leave out the sequels because the real work of literature in this sense is book one. It has the flowing English words, bits of poetry in there, and memorable dialogue, along with good characters. Everything after that doesn't do so much as have a uniqueness to the tone or the way the words go along (there's not even a good enough quote in the sequels to really remember, actually), though character development is just about the only good thing to come. It can be a double edged sword; some of the characters will mellow out and some become hardened types and so on. Anne of Avonlea demonstrates this through the flaw of reinventing the wheel in some chapters. Now there are a few differences between book number one and book number two, mostly in the themes. We start to get a little more mature in themes in this book because Anne Shirley is now a young adult (though a teenager, by modern terms) and she is working as a school teacher. Being a teenager means that her story will take on more mature topics and will be less about imagination.
I wouldn't say there is much of anything new in book two; the real story of Anne is really in book one which is where we see an orphan girl who saw alot of hardships and try to imagine it all away, while feeling very conscious of her red hair, then one day she gets adopted by a brother and sister who sent for a boy and she proves her worth in salt, gets a BFF and becomes a model student in school. All that is in book one. Everything after that is more of Anne being grow up, more practical, and doing things with children more where before we were told of her babysitting routines and rarely saw it in action. Here, she is a teacher and she is handling the twins which gives a kind of new generation feel.
The first example of it reinventing the wheel is in the first chapter. Anne has herself a new milking cow that likes to escape into the yard of Mr. Harrison and attack his crops, which leads to a stand off between them. Anne protests of the fact the fences are not in good shape on his end, which he tells her it is in good shape and that cow is enough to break through a jail fence. To use the George C. Scott move, he tells her that if he finds the cow on his property again "no more Mr. Nice Guy!" Anne is owning a cow which is only mentioned in the first chapter but never said so in the first book, so it gives her the chance to learn some responsibilities, but she is also having other things on her plate and the man is evidently a bad tempered farmer with too much pride for his own good. That is something to glean from the first chapter. However, in the next chapter, after penning Dolly the cow up, Anne finds the cow in the fields again and has to pull her away with Diana's help, and then she sells the cow away. At first, it's all swell until Anne discovers -- lo and behold! -- Dolly is still in her pen. Anne sold Harrison's cow instead!
So, Anne has to visit Mr. Harrison and explain what had happened. Anne basically goes up to Harrison with the feelings of a kid who broke an old man's window with his baseball and must own up to his actions. Fortunately, Harrison is understanding and admits he was a little hasty the previous morning. So, the whole thing was done quickly with Harrison being okay about it. Anne had sold someone else's cow and pays up for it with a cake, which seems fair to Anne in money wise, but how does the man get his milk? Maybe he has more than one cows. It's a detail I didn't notice, I do confess. But, after this incident, Mr. Harrison becomes the old man who lives alone, until this Emily shows up, and he talks of how annoying Rachel Lynde.
One other thing is how show the plot with the cow is: the whole thing is done in three chapters. In three chapters, Harrison goes from irate neighbor to mentor figure in Anne's life. This shows another reinvention of the wheel as Anne still gets into situations that make her learn lessons, all of which results in episodic plot formula in the novel. It's really the introduction of Dora and Davy Keith that changes the format.
Dora and Davy enter the picture because their mother has died and their uncle is a no show (their father is also dead). They are basically twins, though with differing personalities (like some twins are). Dora is well behaved and gentle natured while Davy is rebellious and mischievous. I can hear how one claiming Montgomery is gender type casting in the two: making the girl good and the boy bad (in fact, Davy even lampoons that right to Marilla's face in the chapter "Marilla Adopts Twins"). For the most part, it allows Davy to develop more while Dora rarely fills the pages with anything.
With their parents dead Dora and Davy are adopted by Marilla, which allows for a repeat in history. The development both allows for the reinventing of the wheel moment and gives Anne a role reversal. Now she is the adult along side Marilla and these two twins are the orphans who need adoption. Anne is also now the one who has to guide a child into becoming something, with Davy being her subject. Of course, Anne gives her someone to model to: Paul Irving, and I'll get into him more later. One thing with Davy is he keeps up the bad boy stage for most of the book, be it messing up the kitchen or snatching items during dinner, and doesn't do much of a change until Anne becomes his teacher (awkward). Of course, one could say that Montgomery is writing from a woman's point of view. Most men authors might be like Mark Twain, who would have the boy do these actions and chuckle at how he use to be. Both do understand that there is a time when the boy will stop doing those and become a man, however. As we recall in the first book there were plenty of it with Anne's peers. Gilbert, especially. When he first appeared, he was a trickster who called Anne "Carrots", and he changed by the end of the book. The other boys also grew up, setting aside all the hair pulling on girls and tricking people in order to become serious about professions and careers, as well as respectable.
I guess from this, if one thinks gender roles were made by men in the patriarchal society, women are clearly its enforcers. When the children are being brought up, women take up the mantle of rearing and they teach the boys and girls to be good boys and good girls; telling both what they are suppose to be and what they are not suppose to do. Then women do the same when the boys become men in order to become suitable husbands to girls when the latter become women. Then the wives take up the role of enforcer in arranging rooms or chores while taking up raising the man's children. Kind of does make one wonder if "patriarchal society" might be a misnomer when women do all that enforcing (if not assigning) of gender roles. Even in societies that are not male dominated, the women assign the roles that men are to do and have women take the rest. The plot of Davy, and all the boys in these books, is an illustration of that: Montgomery gives him the role as the playful and mischievous imp who gets into trouble and then Anne and Marilla take it upon themselves to make him good. Because Dora is a girl, there is no problem, which is why I say I can hear critics call that gender type casting.
The early chapters of Anne of Avonlea deal with Anne as a school teacher, or schoolmarm, as they were called at the time. Anne tries to have a much better way of handling her scholars than the previous teachers would. In fact, she points out that Mr. Philips use to whip students and order was never kept. So, she would go the other way and never whip a student. This is in a time when that was still permissible (read, 19th Century). Most of us today would consider Anne to be forward in thinking, just as they would have thought so in 1910, though some of us now think she was more concerned about being liked by her pupils. In her first chapter as teacher, she experiences the problem of parents where some woman named Mrs. H. Donnell comes in and tells her of how she pronounced the name of St. Clair wrong, along with calling the latter Jacob as the boy gave that name. Of course, the younger sibling of Josie Pye is in the list of students, named Anthony, and Anne wants his approval, yet she doesn't get it from the first.
Then, in the chapter titled "A Jonah Day", Anne is having a bad enough day and it is hyped up by a few mishaps, climaxing with Anthony bringing some fireworks to school that are disguised as sweets. After being tossed into the fire, they go off and Anne is in a fit enough rage that she whips Anthony and feels she lost him forever. However, after that Anthony is much more respectful of Anne. In fact, in the same chapter, he helps her with some books on the next day in class. This does seem barbaric to the modern reader: you try to win the love of a student with kindness and fail, yet if you administer corporal punishment on him than he will respect you more. I wouldn't advice using this on children, of course, since the action can lead to trouble. Besides, it's not fool proof. Now, I will say Anthony's whipping reminds me of this scene, only on the hand.
One of the things I liked with Anne's teaching was when she had everyone write to her on something they feel like writing about, which seems a good way to write something. One girl takes the time to write a love letter to Anne, which turns out to be plagiarized. The letter Annetta rips off of was a beau of her mother's before she married, apparently. I noted that her name is a variant of Anne. Annetta is Italian to mean "Little Anne", though she has the non-Italian surname of Bell. No doubt, one would think that Montgomery could have used Annette in naming her, since Canada use to be a French colony, but I guess she thought Annetta sounded like it had plenty of imagination. Well, she repents of plagiarizing, but she does admit to have loved Anne. It seemed more of the admiration of her teacher as opposed to a full blown crush. But, then again, in this time a little girl could have made such thoughts of a female teacher and one would chuckle at it without thinking the girl had homosexual tendencies. If only the same thing would be done with boys.
For that matter, Anne finds one boy she likes: Paul. Paul writes to her of the rock people, his imaginary friends with the names of Nora, Twin Sailors, and The Golden Lady, in one of the letters he wrote to her in the same chapter. Paul is the one student in Anne's class who develops over the course of the book. He and his father are from the United States and are living in Canada. Because of his imagination, Anne relates to him more and they have conversations a few times. When Anne blows up and whips Anthony, it's Paul's eyes that haunt Anne soon afterwards. Gradually, they reconcile, and Paul lets Anne know of how he and his father were previously unacquainted until his mother died and they gradually became acquainted. It's not a bad sort of thing; Mr. Irving is a nice guy. It's just that he is alone and he lets Paul's grandmother do most of the bringing up.
Paul's arc leads us to Lavendar Lewis, a woman who has never married; an "old maid" as they called them then. She is over forty and already having white hair. It turns out, she was once a girlfriend of Paul's father and they would have married, but a problem stood in the way. They had a disagreement and the engagement fell apart and Mr. Irving left elsewhere. He eventually married the woman who became Paul's mother while Miss Lavendar became an old maid. This was not unusual in the 19th Century, given the idea that when engagements break apart it decreases chances of marriage among women (it's worse if the man calls it off and the woman is now considered "damaged goods"). I am certain, even I have no proof supporting it, that some of those women, contrary social expectations, kept their virginity in those engagements that failed, and the same with Miss Lavendar. The reason I can't have proof was because people discuss those things then, so most people just assumed and thus the woman is made to be no longer eligible. Even if we don't take much stock in virginity loss today, there are plenty of women who save it for marriage and I am sure they don't want to be considered "damaged goods" when their engagements end either. (Remarkably, even in today's hook up culture they still don't speak of it). As to Paul's father, he is absent for most of the book and shows up in the chapter "The Prince Comes Back to the Enchanted Palace" (and Montgomery didn't mean the same that the Beast lived in). They are reunited and in the end of the book, they are married, giving Paul a stepmother who was previously his father's fling. Can you ever imagine that today: you and some sweetheart in high school part, move on, one of you marries, has a boy, that boy has a teacher who meets you, befriends you, and then gets you reacquainted with the ex after he or she has been widowed, and then you two marry.
The last way the book reinvents the wheel is when Rachael Lynde becomes a widow and now has to move in with Marilla, whose eyes have recovered since Anne chose to stay. So now, two elderly women, one an old maid and another a widow, are living together with a pair of twins and a teenage girl. At least it doesn't make Anne's plans get derailed. Instead, this will encourage her to get into that long delayed move into college.
Once more, the book wraps up with Anne talking to Gilbert. In book one, they reconcile and become friends after having themselves a cold war for most of the novel. Here, they are closer than before and Montgomery hints that love could be blossoming between them. This is sudden, especially since the whole thing wasn't developed in the book and we didn't have anything to lead to such here. For most of the book, Gilbert and Anne keep things professional, and platonic. Gilbert even assists in this organization that Anne helped set up called Avonlea Village Improvement Society (or AVIS). Diana is also involved and we are introduced to Fred Wright, a plain man who, at the end of the book, gets Diana's heart. It is a surprise to Anne who still thinks she and Diana would be married to some Byronic hero type and Fred is the antithesis of such. Still, that doesn't stop some from believing that Gilbert and Anne are seeing one another. The only clue Montgomery gives is in the end where Gilbert believes he is in love with Anne, but he doesn't let her know. It does make for a plot twist where after so much effort to become friends they should fall for each other and Montgomery was willing to leave it in ambiguity (meaning she left it up to the reader to figure it out so that when the next sequel comes along we can see that resolved). So, for all those wanting to ship Gilanne, or Annebert, I will say keep patient.
Because of the last, I wouldn't say Anne of Avonlea is completely over at the end of the book. It sort of has a little climax, from such a minor build up to follow a mostly episodic plot line, which is enough to make one want to see the next book. Of course, a few other things have tied up: Mr. Harrison has done his arc in going from a crusty old hermit to a friendly neighbor (even getting a wife in the process), Davy reforms from his bad boy days and becomes a nice guy, Paul gets a stepmother, and Miss Lavendar is reunited with a lost love. So, some of the loose ends are tied and now we can continue on to the next book and see Anne go into college and discover if she is ready for love.
I wouldn't say there is much of anything new in book two; the real story of Anne is really in book one which is where we see an orphan girl who saw alot of hardships and try to imagine it all away, while feeling very conscious of her red hair, then one day she gets adopted by a brother and sister who sent for a boy and she proves her worth in salt, gets a BFF and becomes a model student in school. All that is in book one. Everything after that is more of Anne being grow up, more practical, and doing things with children more where before we were told of her babysitting routines and rarely saw it in action. Here, she is a teacher and she is handling the twins which gives a kind of new generation feel.
The first example of it reinventing the wheel is in the first chapter. Anne has herself a new milking cow that likes to escape into the yard of Mr. Harrison and attack his crops, which leads to a stand off between them. Anne protests of the fact the fences are not in good shape on his end, which he tells her it is in good shape and that cow is enough to break through a jail fence. To use the George C. Scott move, he tells her that if he finds the cow on his property again "no more Mr. Nice Guy!" Anne is owning a cow which is only mentioned in the first chapter but never said so in the first book, so it gives her the chance to learn some responsibilities, but she is also having other things on her plate and the man is evidently a bad tempered farmer with too much pride for his own good. That is something to glean from the first chapter. However, in the next chapter, after penning Dolly the cow up, Anne finds the cow in the fields again and has to pull her away with Diana's help, and then she sells the cow away. At first, it's all swell until Anne discovers -- lo and behold! -- Dolly is still in her pen. Anne sold Harrison's cow instead!
So, Anne has to visit Mr. Harrison and explain what had happened. Anne basically goes up to Harrison with the feelings of a kid who broke an old man's window with his baseball and must own up to his actions. Fortunately, Harrison is understanding and admits he was a little hasty the previous morning. So, the whole thing was done quickly with Harrison being okay about it. Anne had sold someone else's cow and pays up for it with a cake, which seems fair to Anne in money wise, but how does the man get his milk? Maybe he has more than one cows. It's a detail I didn't notice, I do confess. But, after this incident, Mr. Harrison becomes the old man who lives alone, until this Emily shows up, and he talks of how annoying Rachel Lynde.
One other thing is how show the plot with the cow is: the whole thing is done in three chapters. In three chapters, Harrison goes from irate neighbor to mentor figure in Anne's life. This shows another reinvention of the wheel as Anne still gets into situations that make her learn lessons, all of which results in episodic plot formula in the novel. It's really the introduction of Dora and Davy Keith that changes the format.
Dora and Davy enter the picture because their mother has died and their uncle is a no show (their father is also dead). They are basically twins, though with differing personalities (like some twins are). Dora is well behaved and gentle natured while Davy is rebellious and mischievous. I can hear how one claiming Montgomery is gender type casting in the two: making the girl good and the boy bad (in fact, Davy even lampoons that right to Marilla's face in the chapter "Marilla Adopts Twins"). For the most part, it allows Davy to develop more while Dora rarely fills the pages with anything.
With their parents dead Dora and Davy are adopted by Marilla, which allows for a repeat in history. The development both allows for the reinventing of the wheel moment and gives Anne a role reversal. Now she is the adult along side Marilla and these two twins are the orphans who need adoption. Anne is also now the one who has to guide a child into becoming something, with Davy being her subject. Of course, Anne gives her someone to model to: Paul Irving, and I'll get into him more later. One thing with Davy is he keeps up the bad boy stage for most of the book, be it messing up the kitchen or snatching items during dinner, and doesn't do much of a change until Anne becomes his teacher (awkward). Of course, one could say that Montgomery is writing from a woman's point of view. Most men authors might be like Mark Twain, who would have the boy do these actions and chuckle at how he use to be. Both do understand that there is a time when the boy will stop doing those and become a man, however. As we recall in the first book there were plenty of it with Anne's peers. Gilbert, especially. When he first appeared, he was a trickster who called Anne "Carrots", and he changed by the end of the book. The other boys also grew up, setting aside all the hair pulling on girls and tricking people in order to become serious about professions and careers, as well as respectable.
I guess from this, if one thinks gender roles were made by men in the patriarchal society, women are clearly its enforcers. When the children are being brought up, women take up the mantle of rearing and they teach the boys and girls to be good boys and good girls; telling both what they are suppose to be and what they are not suppose to do. Then women do the same when the boys become men in order to become suitable husbands to girls when the latter become women. Then the wives take up the role of enforcer in arranging rooms or chores while taking up raising the man's children. Kind of does make one wonder if "patriarchal society" might be a misnomer when women do all that enforcing (if not assigning) of gender roles. Even in societies that are not male dominated, the women assign the roles that men are to do and have women take the rest. The plot of Davy, and all the boys in these books, is an illustration of that: Montgomery gives him the role as the playful and mischievous imp who gets into trouble and then Anne and Marilla take it upon themselves to make him good. Because Dora is a girl, there is no problem, which is why I say I can hear critics call that gender type casting.
The early chapters of Anne of Avonlea deal with Anne as a school teacher, or schoolmarm, as they were called at the time. Anne tries to have a much better way of handling her scholars than the previous teachers would. In fact, she points out that Mr. Philips use to whip students and order was never kept. So, she would go the other way and never whip a student. This is in a time when that was still permissible (read, 19th Century). Most of us today would consider Anne to be forward in thinking, just as they would have thought so in 1910, though some of us now think she was more concerned about being liked by her pupils. In her first chapter as teacher, she experiences the problem of parents where some woman named Mrs. H. Donnell comes in and tells her of how she pronounced the name of St. Clair wrong, along with calling the latter Jacob as the boy gave that name. Of course, the younger sibling of Josie Pye is in the list of students, named Anthony, and Anne wants his approval, yet she doesn't get it from the first.
Then, in the chapter titled "A Jonah Day", Anne is having a bad enough day and it is hyped up by a few mishaps, climaxing with Anthony bringing some fireworks to school that are disguised as sweets. After being tossed into the fire, they go off and Anne is in a fit enough rage that she whips Anthony and feels she lost him forever. However, after that Anthony is much more respectful of Anne. In fact, in the same chapter, he helps her with some books on the next day in class. This does seem barbaric to the modern reader: you try to win the love of a student with kindness and fail, yet if you administer corporal punishment on him than he will respect you more. I wouldn't advice using this on children, of course, since the action can lead to trouble. Besides, it's not fool proof. Now, I will say Anthony's whipping reminds me of this scene, only on the hand.
One of the things I liked with Anne's teaching was when she had everyone write to her on something they feel like writing about, which seems a good way to write something. One girl takes the time to write a love letter to Anne, which turns out to be plagiarized. The letter Annetta rips off of was a beau of her mother's before she married, apparently. I noted that her name is a variant of Anne. Annetta is Italian to mean "Little Anne", though she has the non-Italian surname of Bell. No doubt, one would think that Montgomery could have used Annette in naming her, since Canada use to be a French colony, but I guess she thought Annetta sounded like it had plenty of imagination. Well, she repents of plagiarizing, but she does admit to have loved Anne. It seemed more of the admiration of her teacher as opposed to a full blown crush. But, then again, in this time a little girl could have made such thoughts of a female teacher and one would chuckle at it without thinking the girl had homosexual tendencies. If only the same thing would be done with boys.
For that matter, Anne finds one boy she likes: Paul. Paul writes to her of the rock people, his imaginary friends with the names of Nora, Twin Sailors, and The Golden Lady, in one of the letters he wrote to her in the same chapter. Paul is the one student in Anne's class who develops over the course of the book. He and his father are from the United States and are living in Canada. Because of his imagination, Anne relates to him more and they have conversations a few times. When Anne blows up and whips Anthony, it's Paul's eyes that haunt Anne soon afterwards. Gradually, they reconcile, and Paul lets Anne know of how he and his father were previously unacquainted until his mother died and they gradually became acquainted. It's not a bad sort of thing; Mr. Irving is a nice guy. It's just that he is alone and he lets Paul's grandmother do most of the bringing up.
Paul's arc leads us to Lavendar Lewis, a woman who has never married; an "old maid" as they called them then. She is over forty and already having white hair. It turns out, she was once a girlfriend of Paul's father and they would have married, but a problem stood in the way. They had a disagreement and the engagement fell apart and Mr. Irving left elsewhere. He eventually married the woman who became Paul's mother while Miss Lavendar became an old maid. This was not unusual in the 19th Century, given the idea that when engagements break apart it decreases chances of marriage among women (it's worse if the man calls it off and the woman is now considered "damaged goods"). I am certain, even I have no proof supporting it, that some of those women, contrary social expectations, kept their virginity in those engagements that failed, and the same with Miss Lavendar. The reason I can't have proof was because people discuss those things then, so most people just assumed and thus the woman is made to be no longer eligible. Even if we don't take much stock in virginity loss today, there are plenty of women who save it for marriage and I am sure they don't want to be considered "damaged goods" when their engagements end either. (Remarkably, even in today's hook up culture they still don't speak of it). As to Paul's father, he is absent for most of the book and shows up in the chapter "The Prince Comes Back to the Enchanted Palace" (and Montgomery didn't mean the same that the Beast lived in). They are reunited and in the end of the book, they are married, giving Paul a stepmother who was previously his father's fling. Can you ever imagine that today: you and some sweetheart in high school part, move on, one of you marries, has a boy, that boy has a teacher who meets you, befriends you, and then gets you reacquainted with the ex after he or she has been widowed, and then you two marry.
The last way the book reinvents the wheel is when Rachael Lynde becomes a widow and now has to move in with Marilla, whose eyes have recovered since Anne chose to stay. So now, two elderly women, one an old maid and another a widow, are living together with a pair of twins and a teenage girl. At least it doesn't make Anne's plans get derailed. Instead, this will encourage her to get into that long delayed move into college.
Once more, the book wraps up with Anne talking to Gilbert. In book one, they reconcile and become friends after having themselves a cold war for most of the novel. Here, they are closer than before and Montgomery hints that love could be blossoming between them. This is sudden, especially since the whole thing wasn't developed in the book and we didn't have anything to lead to such here. For most of the book, Gilbert and Anne keep things professional, and platonic. Gilbert even assists in this organization that Anne helped set up called Avonlea Village Improvement Society (or AVIS). Diana is also involved and we are introduced to Fred Wright, a plain man who, at the end of the book, gets Diana's heart. It is a surprise to Anne who still thinks she and Diana would be married to some Byronic hero type and Fred is the antithesis of such. Still, that doesn't stop some from believing that Gilbert and Anne are seeing one another. The only clue Montgomery gives is in the end where Gilbert believes he is in love with Anne, but he doesn't let her know. It does make for a plot twist where after so much effort to become friends they should fall for each other and Montgomery was willing to leave it in ambiguity (meaning she left it up to the reader to figure it out so that when the next sequel comes along we can see that resolved). So, for all those wanting to ship Gilanne, or Annebert, I will say keep patient.
Because of the last, I wouldn't say Anne of Avonlea is completely over at the end of the book. It sort of has a little climax, from such a minor build up to follow a mostly episodic plot line, which is enough to make one want to see the next book. Of course, a few other things have tied up: Mr. Harrison has done his arc in going from a crusty old hermit to a friendly neighbor (even getting a wife in the process), Davy reforms from his bad boy days and becomes a nice guy, Paul gets a stepmother, and Miss Lavendar is reunited with a lost love. So, some of the loose ends are tied and now we can continue on to the next book and see Anne go into college and discover if she is ready for love.